Code reviews for everybodyĪs part of working on teams it’s always important that we get our code reviewed by our peers.Īs part of GitHub’s systems we can prevent code from showing on our master branch until it has been approved by someone else. Creating a pull request for a small typo is a little annoying, yes, but it keeps us all accountable for changes that get deployed to the live website. ![]() Branches for bug fixesĮven a small typo or bug fix will get its own branch. We can even use branches for testing something out, if it fails, we can just discard the branch and we don’t accidentally affect the live website. Of course it’s important to merge the code into master first. When a feature is complete the branch is discarded & not used again. We don’t directly commit to master because we want our code vetted before launching to users.Įach new feature we want to add to our website get its own branch.Only approved code should be put onto master because it will show on the website for real users.master is the exact replica of what’s online.Most often, on teams, we protect the master branch: the prevent erroneous commits going onto master-which also means they will go onto the live website. Git branching solves this problem by providing a clean way to make copies of your code to work on a specific feature.īranches help facilitate working on teams a little better, because we can have a pristine version of the website: master and then we work on separate branches. ![]() Now you have a litter of different files for different features you’ve tried out. ![]() Then you decide you want to try something else, you copy and name it version-3. You write some code then decide you want to try something else, so you make a copy, maybe you name it version-2. Think about how you generally work on some code.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |